“We had lost our footwear in previous skirmishes; but we still had our ‘kuppies’, the cyanide capsules we wore around our necks. We were better prepared for death than for life.” This is what a 17-year-old child soldier holding the AK-47 thought to herself while moving forward to escape soldiers in an ambush.
After 25 years, this child soldier gives the world a fine insight into the early stages of Tamil militancy and what influenced thousands of youth to sacrifice their lives a cause, through her 300-page book, The Tamil Tigress.
She, now a professional, a mother of two and living in Australia, relates her story as a child soldier in Sri Lanka’s bloody civil war. Her book is now being included in the list of 50 books by the Australian Ministry for the Arts as ‘one of the books you can’t put down for 2011 – 2012’.
Here, the ‘Tamil Tigress’ speaks. Giving her first local newspaper interview to The Island, Niromi de Soyza, who writes under a pseudonym, says she learnt about non-violence in a hard way and believes the American novelist Tom Robbins’s saying: ‘There are many things worth living for, a few things worth dying for, but nothing worth killing for’.
Following are the excerpts of the interview:
Q: What is your memory of Jaffna, its people and your childhood?
A: I describe this in quite a lot of detail in the book. I had an idyllic and carefree childhood in the Hill country where I was born and moved to Jaffna town after I turned 8. Although life in the north was different in many ways due to its conservative culture and emphasis on education, I still had an enjoyable time. But when I was around 11 years old, the library was burnt down. It had been my favourite place to visit in Jaffna, even more than the Subramaniam Park or Casuarina beach! Everything changed after that. My environment became serious and gradually descended into anarchy by the time I was a teenager.
Q. Who were your role models?
A: Although born a whole decade earlier, the great Indian poet Subramaniya Bharathiyar was my role model as a child. He had very modern ideas for society, and women in particular. I admired his writing and aspired to be everything he said a modern woman should be. As I describe in the book, my aunties were a great influence too, as they were intelligent, fierce and independent Jaffna women.
Q: What made you join the LTTE in spite of dangers?
A: Many pages in my book are devoted to explaining how my life changed from being relatively normal to witnessing some terrible things only war can bring. For me, it was a gradual process of disenchantment with the way things were unfolding around me, things I had no control over.
I was only a child and I thought I was going to be killed randomly for no fault of my own. I had two options as I saw them – fight or flee. I chose the former, as many other young people did. You believe you can change the world at that age.
Q: The LTTE recruited children to fight and even they used them as suicide bombers. As a child soldier, how do you view the outfit’s child conscription?
A: I joined the movement voluntarily, in fact my best friend Ajanthi and I had to coerce them to enlist us. There were many children even then, in the mid-late 1980’s, and they, too, joined voluntarily. Because I left the movement in 1988 and did not follow what went on thereafter, I
can’t answer specifically about the LTTE. It’s commonly agreed that forcible recruitment of anyone, let alone children, for any kind of abusive act is not acceptable under any circumstances.
Q: How do you describe Jaffna under IPKF and the LTTE’s relationship with India then?
A: I was only young and a low-ranking newly recruited foot soldier at that. I didn’t know much about LTTE’s relationship with India but simply followed orders. Although Jaffna under the IPKF seemed ideal to start with, after the war broke out between the IPKF and the Tigers, it became an utter nightmare.
Q: Did Prabhakaran have faith in an Indian intervention?
A: Obviously I can’t speak for him but the fact that the LTTE ended up fighting the Indian forces in Jaffna may indicate to any ordinary person, that he didn’t.
Q: You are one of the few who had connections with Prabhakaran, who made youth die for his cause. What do you think of him?
A: Many have had much more contact with Prabhakaran than I. In my limited encounters with him, I thought him very charismatic. I guess it is his charisma that made many including me, follow his leadership.
Q: The LTTE destroyed the country’s most distinguished Tamils. What are your comments about the LTTE’s stance to silence those who crossed its path?
A: As many reviewers have accurately pointed out, my book is an impartial account of what I witnessed during my time in Sri Lanka, warts and all. The long civil war claimed many people who could’ve contributed greatly to humanity. We like to see real life play out like movies, where there are black and white characters of villains and heroes, but civil war is simply a nasty business where the moral compass goes missing from the start.
Q: Women give a human touch to every society. What is your view about the outfit, which made helpless women to become suicide bombers?
A: In my time, there were no female suicide bombers. There was only one male suicide bomber, Capt. Miller of Nelliyadi. Many of my female comrades wanted to become suicide bombers of their own will. They thought it was the highest sacrifice they could make for their people’s freedom. It is terribly sad that so many lives were lost in this horrific manner.
Q: You have written the Tamil Tigress after two decades of silence, since you left the Lankan shores. What really made you write your saga and why did you not think of this while Prabhakaran was alive?
A: When I left Sri Lanka over two decades ago, I didn’t carry the baggage with me. I left it for good and had no interest in Sri Lankan politics and did not follow and developments there. After the war ended in 2009 and Sri Lankans began to arrive in boatloads in Australia, it was in our local news everyday and still is. I realized many Australians had no idea of what the civil war was about in Sri Lanka and I thought telling a personal story would give them an insight. And of course, the opportunity presented itself at the right time.
Q: If you compare the Tamil militancy during your stay in the LTTE and after, what went wrong with the LTTE for its defeat?
A: When I was part of the outfit, it seemed like a disorganised and chaotic band of young people who could have been defeated easily. But of course, they became very powerful. I can’t say how it all came to such end, as I wasn’t there and hadn’t followed the rise and fall of the
Tigers. I’m sure that there are many experts who could shed light on this.
Q: Do you still believe that Tamils need Eelam?
A: I don’t live in Sri Lanka and may never will, so what I think does not matter. Being an idealist, I like to see a utopian society where every person, regardless their ethnicity, gender, position or belief, is valued equally.
Q: Even in the absence of Prabhakaran and with the defeat of the LTTE, some still cling on to the idea of Eelam. Do you think they will be able to mislead others again?
A: Good question – one that is best answered by the Tamils living in Sri Lanka.
Q: As a member of the Tamil diaspora how do you see their contribution to make the lives of Tamils, who suffered in one of the worst battles in the recent history, better?
A: I see myself as an individual who can make a small difference to the suffering of post-war survivors. I donate part of the proceeds from the book to the education of war affected children and I also sponsor. It is up to each one to do what they can, big or small to make a positive difference. Many from the Diaspora are already contributing enormously to uplift affected lives in Sri Lanka and build ethnic harmony, which is to be highly commended.
Q: Though some still level some allegations about the post conflict development, most of those who visited the North are convinced when they see the ground realities. How do you see the post conflict development in Sri Lanka as an outsider?
A: Not having visited Sri Lanka myself, I cannot speak from a personal point of view. As you say, those who see it for themselves are better equipped to judge.
Q: What do you think of the ex-LTTE cadres, who are still being rehabilitated and others who have already been reunited with their families?
A: I truly hope that the physical and emotional scars they carry will heal over time and they can lead constructive lives, just as I have. I hope too, that they are given all the support and the compassion that they deserve through this difficult phase of transition.
Q: Do you regret that you were misled? What was the biggest lesson that you learnt as an ex-Tigress?
A: As I mentioned earlier, my friend and I joined the Tigers voluntarily. After witnessing the horrible effects of war, including the death of my best friend at such a tender age, I learnt it the hard way, that a life of violence was not for me. I concluded as the American novelist Tom Robbins did, ‘There are many things worth living for, a few things worth dying for, but nothing worth killing for’.
Q: Once you mentioned that you wrote your book after seeing boat loads of Tamils fleeing Sri Lanka. Why do you think they take such risky journeys and do you see any involvement of the LTTE remnants in smuggling them to Australia and Canada?
A: Having spoken to a few of those who took the treacherous journey around 2010 to Australia, I understand that there certainly was a perceived fear for one’s own safety and for their family’s which was their reason for fleeing. As to who is involved in the smuggling operation, I have no idea.
Q: Some question the authenticity of the story in your book. How do you respond to this allegation?
A: Many have dispelled these myths. I trust in the intelligence of the readers – to read the book with an open mind without agendas and to listen to my many interviews and make up their own mind.
Q: How do you see your life as a writer now and what is your next challenge?
A: I don’t consider myself a writer but as someone who shared a personal story with those who want to know. My challenge is to appreciate life everyday by doing simple things that I love – it’s a cliché I know, but tomorrow may never come.
Q: Though you have adopted a pseudonym, from your picture people know who Niromi is. Do you still prefer to live under your pen name?
A: I wrote under a nom de plume which gave me a chance to honor the memory of Richard de Soyza, whom I watched read the evening news on Rupavahini while I was growing up. I have great respect for journalists and the difficulties they face to bring us the news. I will continue
to keep Richard’s memory alive.
Q. What would be your message to the world?
A: War ruins ordinary people’s lives on both sides of the divide, no matter what anyone says to justify it. I’ll never have my best friend Ajanthi back, and her family, their daughter and sister. As British Philosopher Bertrand Russell put it: ‘War doesn’t determine who is
right – only who is left’. In this modern age, we should be better able to resolve conflicts instead of employing primitive methods such as fighting and killing. All an ordinary person wants is to be able to get on with their lives and it is the responsibility of leaders to ensure that it happens.
Unfolded truth about the Tamil Tigress –book written by Niromi De soyza ( Sri Lankan born ) by Judy Mariampillai
Dear Mr P S Suryanarayana
Mr P S Suryanarayana is Editor (Current Affairs) at the Institute of South Asian Studies (ISAS), anautonomous research institute at the National University of Singapore
I read review about the book Tamil Tigress was published in one of the papers. I thought , it is worth to expose some of the serious untruthfulness in the book.
The title of the book starts with the title “Tamil Tigress: my story as a child soldier in Sri Lanka’s bloody civil war by Niromi de Soyza “ which was initially published by the Australian publisher Allen and Unwin in 2011.This book sounds quite intriguing as it is difficult to find an insider’s account .After reading the Tamil Tigress book and the questions raised by the leading critics who are historians and scholars, I thought it is worth to unfold the truth about the book and the author niromi De Soyza. I am not an activist . I am a just reader who is interested in Sri Lankan affairs and related to Ajanthi ( we called her Nirmala) who was the centre piece of the book. Here are some of the challenges raised by the scholars and historians and Niromi de Soyza yet to answer the questions. Many journalist wanted to have a face to face meeting or phone interview. De Soyza refused to answer those questions.
a. False claim by Niromi de Soyza as a Child solider
The book title started with a story of the child soldier. In fact the author Niromi De Soyza was not a child soldier when she joined LTTE. Niromi acknowledged that her year of birth was 1969 in many interviews. In page 103 she claims her birthday is in mid-June. Therefore ” two days before Christmas in 1987″ she was 18. Niromi was no longer a child (Under 18). It is part of the deceptive marketing.
b. Artificial image to portrayed the Author Niromi de Soyza
From the launch of the first edition, Niromi has been portraying her artificial image .The following facebook link showed the actual and artificial image . The real photo was taken in 2012 >>. (reference 1)
c. Making up false stories to suite the audience .
During the launch of the first edition of the book in July 2011, Niromi de Soyza spoke against the Sri Lankan Government to get the support from the Sri Lankan Tamils Diaspora in Australia .Her attempts were miserably failed as the majority Tamils immigrated to Australia were under skilled migrants category and they easily discerned Niromi De Soyza’s deceptive methods.
Niromi de soyza mentioned during the interview with Allen &Unwin , the publisher of the Tamil Tigress book that she was proud for not associating with the Sri Lankan community . However Niromi de soyza failed to realise that she landed as a student in the Australian soil and claimed refugee status and completed her Bachelor and Master degree program under the Australian taxpayer’s money !.
In the recent publisher’s trade exhibition in Byran bay, Niromi de Soyza demonstrated the cyanide capsule [common practice by LTTE suicide cadres to avoid getting into Sri Lankan army’s hand] using her hand with condom cover. After realising her support for the illegal boat people is not welcome by the Australian community, Niromi de Soyza is currently wearing a new cloak called “ Motivational speaker ” . Author de Soyza often uses her crocodile tears to get the full attention of the audience in most of her public meetings.
During the recent interview with ABC about the indefinite detention, Niromi De Soyza focused only the promoting her own book not about the refugees in the detention centre.
Niromi de soyza’s first public forum was on the 19 July 2011 in AIIA NSW. The program forensically investigates allegations that up to 40,000 Tamil civilians were killed as Sri Lankan Government forces moved in to destroy the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam ( LTTE) . I attended the forum.
I also attended her public appearance in Melbourne along with two leading Sri Lankan academics and journalist . Sri Lankan journalist publicly challenged her about her untruthful and contradicting statements in the book Tamil Tigress and during the radio interview . Author of Tamil tigress book was unable to answer those allegations against her.
Niromi De Soyza spoke about her compelling reason for her to write the book was to give voice for boat people in Australia. Niromi de Soyza is becoming unpopular about her compelling reason as Australian Government and opposition support the off shore processing for the illegal migrant. After realising the threat to her own popularity , Niromi de soyza removed the video clip from her own website . The video was explaining the reason for writing the book.
De Soyza is using the religion to sell her book to the catholic community . She wrote her review in the catholic magazine under the title of “In 1987, 17-year old Niromi de Soyza shocked her middle-class Catholic Sri Lankan family by joining the Tamil Tigers “ .With that quota she spoke about the made up stories among the catholic school children .
After failure of convincing her own Tamil community in Australia, De Soyza wanted to get into Sinhalese Australian migrant community . Melbourne is a place where most of Sinhalese speaking people live in Australia. When she presented to the Sri Lankan community, a couple of leading Sinhalese native speaking academics and a well-known economist had confronted Niromi de soyza at a public meeting in Melbourne .
De Soyza claimed that she was with the LTTE group for only eight months . because of the ill treatment to her boyfriend Roshan (lover) by the LTTE leaders and later Roshan was murdered in India lead her to pour her hate feeling through one chapter. She grew up in Jaffna with her father who worked in Middle east country for the sake of money, Rejection of the society by the cast system lead her to motivate her to write a book initially and later changed her thought to make fortune out of portraying her close friend Ajanthi ( Nirmala) in her book.
d. Deceptive promotional methods are widely used by the Author Niromi de soyza to sell her book Tamil Tigress
Deceptive promotion of Tamil Tigress in North America
The review of the Tamil Tigress book was written by Koom Kankesan a Canadian Tamil recently exposed by the editor of the New Direction of Time .
Soon after the review was published in the New Direction of Time in Canada , Many readers who knew the truth commented to Koon’s review .But the reviews, which challenged the author Niromi De Soyza, were removed by the request of Koom Kankesan. Here is what Geoffrey says ” I’ve removed a certain comment at the request of Mr. Kankesan. I’ve done this not because I am taking a side in the matter. I know little about it. I like him so I’ve agreed to his request. That’s all ” . I commended Geoffrey’s openness and truthfulness.
Untruthfulness of the Tamil Tigress author Niromi de soyza and her book not only mislead authors like Koom Kankesan and DBS Jeyaraj , but also lead the readers to portrait a bad image about the DBS and Koom Kankesan.
You can view the comments from the editor of The New direction of time under comments section http://thenewdirectionoftime.com/2012/07/02/tamil-tigress-reviewed-by-koom-kankesan/#comments
Deceptive promotion of Tamil Tigress in India
After the second edition , published in India ( changed the cover from Tamil girl with gun to Tamil girl wearing sari ) Author Niromi de Soyza wrote her own review and published in the Indian media under the title of ” LTTE tortured and killed while fighting Indians: Ex-cadre’s book
Deceptive promotion of Tamil Tigress in Sri Lanka
Knowing the danger of the having the last chapter of the first ediNiromi de Soyza removed the chapter “Afterwards” in the second edition .
e. Why did Niromi De Soyza remove the last chapter from the first edition?
In the Last chapter “Afterwards” , Niromi De Soyza openly criticised against the government of Sri Lanka and calling for the international community ‘s involvement in Sri Lankan affair . Compelling reason for her to remove the chapter so that she can sell her book in the local bookstores in Sri Lanka .
f. Niromi de Soyza’s Compelling reasons have changed with the new opportunities to sell the book
Compelling reason started with voice for Sri Lankan boat people in Australia , now voice for peace and harmony and charity . observers predicts her might change anytime in the future to gain more popularity through the controversial stunt and hot topics in the market.
A leading Sri Lankan historian like Prof Michael Robert, Adelaide brought the untruthfulness and her contracting statements during the Australian Radio interview to the day light . However Prof Robert was biased towards to the Government of Sri Lanka and for that reason Tamil community did not take Prof Michael’s article into account.
After attending the public forum in Melbourne, Australia organised by Dr.Sarvananthan ( an Economist ) , Dr.Sarvananthan brought Niromi’s fake identity to the day light. Dr.Sarvananthan was against the Tamil Diaspora because of that reason Tamil people even did not take his criticism into consideration.
In the recent interview which was published in the Island (19/09/2012) , De Soyza did not speak about her favourite topics such as the human rights violation by the Government of Sri Lanka or Asylum seekers by the boats to the Australian Shore. Niromi de Soyza was only concern about promotion of her book Tamil Tigress.
Niromi De Soyza’s class mates from the schools she studied ( Holy Family Convent and Chundikuli Girls’ College) in Jaffna Sri Lanka started to question Niromi de Soyza about the actual motive of writing the book other than making money by portraying her close friend Ajanthi ( Nirmala) . They could not find any other motive behind it.
Author Niromi De Soyza should answer to the allegation brought by critics. Her continuous silence will lead to more unanswered questions.